Preliminary data analysis. Preliminary screening of the data removed 25 participants from the sample, as it took them less than 5 minutes to complete the survey. Two out of five subscales in the survey had items that were removed from the results due to Cronbach`s low alpha. These include where the couple would reside after the marriage (conditions of a marriage contract) and 10 out of 19 cultural objects. The cultural dimensions were divided into 3 dimensions, guided by others, followed by others and guided by themselves. Attachment was coded in 2 avoidance and anxiety subscales, as these styles were most relevant to the rationale for this study. Missing values have, if any, been replaced by M values. Not only is it not a good idea to enter into a marriage contract alone, but in many states each party must have its own legal representation. And even if separate lawyers are not mandatory, renouncing them can convince a judge to expel the Prenup from court. The opposition argues that for the love couple, marriage contracts are virtually random pieces of paper that have no value to them, because they are probably never used. It`s not true.
We have already shown you in the previous argument that these agreements are extremely important. If people really only cared about love and never thought about the future, they would simply sign the agreement, but this is not true: in reality, these agreements are carefully crafted with lawyers and mutual legal assistance, which means that these agreements are not written in a simple way. In addition, the lawyers will obviously point out problematic areas of the agreement: for example, if one party says, “If we divorce, the other party can take everything I own,” the lawyer will make it clear that the party making such a statement is not very wise. The same also works in less dramatic cases. In the second case, where marriage contracts are used to deceive other people around their property, we find that the other party is also protected in the first place and most often by his own lawyer, who indicates that his client is treated unfairly. Banning marriage contracts may deter some couples from getting married because they won`t be able to make some kind of deal they feel comfortable with. Marriage itself is a kind of contract. If the way the marriage ends is entirely controlled by the state (the courts), many people will not be able to counter the risks they see in marriage with another type of contract – a marriage contract. Some people will fear the divorce procedure, which will become more painful, complicated and impersonal if voluntary agreements are not taken into account in the form of pre-nups, others will fear for their fortune.
However, informal partnerships offer little legal protection to the parties involved and, in the end, people will be worse off. Pre-nups enhance people`s freedom to enter into the kind of agreements they feel comfortable with and what they really want, while containing the legal protection of the state. We believe it is important for any legal framework to inflame the emotional harm of those involved in legal proceedings.